[ad_1]
Grinding espresso bean-by-bean is up there with cryogenic grinding, double grinding and re-processing as a sort of impractical perfection — all of that are usually dismissed as inappropriate for the industrial setting. Moist grinding isn’t a factor — it was only a dream of the early third wavers — however let’s throw that in there too. Cryogenic grinding is a factor, however on this put up we’re gonna clarify the way it was that we discovered an actual world sensible use for bean-by-bean grinding.
So far, one of the best investigation into bean-by-bean grinding was carried out by astrophysicist-cum-barista Prof Jonathan Gagne. Just a few years again, a few of his subscribers have been involved about how the widespread uptake of single-dose grinding (the place you throw a pre weighed dose of beans into an empty grinder hopper) would change the best way espresso grinders carry out, in comparison with when the beans are fed into the burrs via a full hopper. Jonathan managed to show that the difference was real but possibly negligible; i.e. just a couple of beans at the end would experience the so-called popcorn effect and grind a little more coarsely.
There are two terms you need to know before you read any further.
Popcorning
When coffee beans are driven through the rotating grinder burrs, they must navigate through whatever gaps present themselves between these burrs which aren’t already occupied by other grinds moving through the system. In contrast, the behaviour of a solitary bean in an empty hopper is markedly different. Without the collective pressure of other beans, a solitary bean bounces around haphazardly, sometimes slipping through largest gaps at the edges of the burrs known as the tertiary cuts. Single beans also tend to bounce around at the entrance to the blades, resembling popcorn kernels popping and jumping in a hot pan, which is why it is aptly named “popcorning” or “the popcorn effect.”
Outfall Depth
The ‘outfall depth’ in the context of coffee grinding refers to the size of the opening on the side of the burr which is created when the burr’s cutting edges, specifically the tertiary cuts, align. This gap is the exit path for the boulders coffee particles. The outfall depth is significant because it directly influences the grinding efficiency and the consistency of the ground coffee:
Larger Outfall Depth: A larger gap allows coffee particles to exit the burrs more quickly, leading to faster grinding. However, this increased speed can result in a wider range of particle sizes, as the beans are not ground as uniformly. The consequence is a less consistent grind, which can affect the extraction and flavour of the coffee.
Smaller Outfall Depth: Conversely, a smaller tertiary cut at the edge of a coffee burr restricts the flow of ground coffee, slowing down the grinding process. While this might take more time, it typically results in a more uniform grind, with particles being more consistently sized.
Gagne’s experiment did a good job at quieting concerns that single doses could create inferior grind profiles, compared to full hoppers. He speculated that it’s probably only the last couple beans that experience the popcorn effect and the particle size analyses he ran comparing the two grind profiles from his Niche grinder were virtually identical. But, in his blog post he also made this observation:
‘Grinding bean-by-bean generates a slightly tighter [grind size] distribution, subsequently mimicking the next high quality grinder.’
Quickly after Gagne’s put up, The Hoff additionally had a go at it, combining double-grinding and an extremely sluggish feed into his grinder, and stated afterwards
‘I used to be in a position to produce what I feel was a sweeter, tastier, extra scrumptious espresso.’
Since then, bean-by-bean grinding has sat there as a tempting frontier with various unexplored potential. After which, unexpectedly we wanted bean-by-bean grinding — not simply to please the espresso gods, however for precise sensible causes.
The Experiments
As you realize, we’ve been writing concerning the new technology of filter baskets just lately. One factor all the brand new excessive extraction baskets have in widespread is that they require you to grind quite a bit finer. And generally, in case you occur to make use of an oily darkish roast — otherwise you haven’t cleaned your burrs for a while, you might discover that your grinder gets completely choked up, with the beans unable to exit the grinder at all. It happens all the time with really dark roasts. For this reason, makers of commercial grinders — especially ones like the Mazzer ZM which have a digital grind adjustment mechanism — sometimes create a minimum grind setting to prevent grinders getting choked and also to prevent burrs from grinding against each other.
Well, our grinder choked up while we were testing our new Sworks Billet basket. With that particular coffee, we found bean-by-bean grinding was a handy way of guaranteeing beans at any roast level would always feed into the burrs properly. Plus, in theory, bean-by-bean appeals to us because each individual bean can have the same experience as it enters and leaves the burrs — it never has to wait in the queue. The thing is though, the bean-by-bean approach pushed the required grind setting a LOT finer. Not just a LOT finer … so much finer that we had to change from Mazzer’s k151I to the k151B 83-mm burr set, which has just about the smallest outfall depth you can find.
Three 83-mm burr sets with increasingly large tertiary cuts. From left to right, the k151B (espresso burr); the k151I (hybrid burr); the k151F (filter burr)
We asked Lloyd Meadows at Tortoise Espresso to have a crack at bean-by-bean on his EK43 grinder, paired with his new Pesado HE% baskets. Lloyd soon found himself on the absolute finest setting his EK would allow and his shot times were gushing through in eight seconds. So we’d now maxed out the fine-grind potential of two of the industry’s leading single-dose grinders, but we weren’t going to quit. (Please note: Lloyd doesn’t use the Turkish burrs — we’re expecting they would be suitable for bean-by-bean grinding for espresso)
Next step was to override the ZM’s safety features (don’t try this at home). After recalibrating the ZM grinder to grind finer than would usually be possible, we were dialled in for bean-by-bean grinding on a setting roughly twice as fine as the single-dose setting. And the bean-by-bean shots were averaging a full percentage point higher than the full hopper. (If you’re not familiar with measuring coffee extractions, a 1% increase is a lot). We went from an average of 22.3% up to 23.3%. It’s hard to slow down high extraction baskets much past 16-20 seconds, but those bean-by-bean shots that took around 31–41 seconds were absolute godshots.
You look at our data set and you can see how much higher and tighter the extraction yield percentage is from bean-by-bean. So, a couple of thoughts here: whilst bean-by-bean may be slow and impractical, it makes unbelievably tasty espresso. It also makes your grinder way quieter, even though the motor is on for longer. We can speculate that it will significantly reduce heat build up in the burrs (that’s a test for another day) and we know it alleviates issues of grinders getting choked, even with evil dark roasts. The automated fix for this could be as simple as redesigning the auger that brings the beans into the burrs to slow down the feed or putting another auger in the hopper as well. As things stand, this approach may require the beans to go marching one-by-one, but for sure this is a fast track if you wanna ‘get-down to the grounds.’
[ad_2]
